Moral Reflection

(Name (Professor (Subjectxx February 2008Moral ReflectionEveryday in our lives we ar forced into making good decisions only when ab out(a) some(prenominal)thing under the sun . There are situations that make such(prenominal) execute difficult , and at that place are situations where the resolvent appears to be just right in front of our faces . I conceive it would be difficult for anyone to check on any respectable plight if he has no clear idea of moralityPerson onlyy , I am aware that of at least two honest principles that go past me in my effortless ethical decision-making . These are utilitarianism and Kantian moral doctrine . utilitarianism holds that a someone s fermention would be get a lineed morally right if it tends to promote happiness for the greatest upset of people . Thus , utilitarianism as a mora l philosophy places emphasis on the consequences of human forgeion rather than on the motives behind such action (West . On the other go past Kantian moral philosophy , or to a greater extent popularly known as the categorical imperative , is ground on notions of obligation , necessity and reason Kant hoped that morality consists in the choosing and doing tight-laced call for , and the proper action is bring downd entirely by discerning considerations . Thus , Kant holds that prejudiced considerations including emotions , should not be considered in moral decision-making (The Internet Encyclopedia of PhilosophyI weigh in two these theories and I use them both(prenominal) when I judge everyday ethical dilemmas . There are times when . I believe purely rational considerations should prevail , but there are times that I also consider subjective factors bid emotions . I believe that both theories guide my actions and decisions , and both surrender me to weigh various con siderations in my mindNevertheless , I belie! ve that Kant s method acting in determining the right conduct is a punter decision-making process , because Kant provded clear criteria for choosing .

Kant provided this rule , thusly So act , that the rule on which thou actest would adapt of organism espouse as a law by all rational beings (KantThis rule is easier to follow since it does not waver dep last on my modality or subjective druthers , which could change in any day . It serves as a true north which teaches all men how to think and decide moral dilemmasOne moral resultant that deeply concerns me is euthanasia , or mercy killing . euthanasia is defined as an act characterize d by the intentional ending of a patient s feel by a atomic number 101 , unremarkably by lethal injection (Religion Facts Euthanasia is continuously being raised as an option where a person is with a terminal illness and slim chances of recovering . It is an authorised impression for me because I could easily imagine myself in the beat of the inauspicious person s family , and I could imagine subjective feelings that would dictate every euthanasia or maintaining life condescend . In these kinds of situations , utilitarianism could support either position , as the decision would work out on the consequences of an action . On the other hand , Kantian philosophy could provide a more definitive dress , but such answer would definitely not consider emotions , because...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay