Cactus Hill (USA) - Possible Preclovis Site in Virginia

Cactus Hill (USA) - Possible Preclovis Site in Virginia Cactus Hill (Smithsonian designation 44SX202) is the name of a buried multi-component archaeological site on the coastal plain of the Nottaway River in Sussex County, Virginia. The site has both Archaic and Clovis occupations, but most importantly and once quite controversially, below the Clovis and separated by what appears to be a variably thick (7–20 centimeters or about 3–8 inches) level of sterile sand, is what excavators argue is a Pre-Clovis occupation. Data from the Site Excavators report that the Pre-Clovis level has a stone tool assemblage with heavy percentages of quartzite blades, and pentangular (five-sided) projectile points. Data on the artifacts has yet to be published in detailed peer-reviewed contexts, but even skeptics agree the assemblage includes small polyhedral cores, blade-like flakes, and basally thinned bifacial points.   Numerous projectile points were recovered from the various levels of Cactus Hill, including Middle Archaic Morrow Mountain Points and two classic fluted Clovis points. Two projectile points from what are thought to be Pre-Clovis levels are named Cactus Hill points. Based on the photographs published in Johnson, Cactus Hill points are small point, made from a blade or flake, and pressure flaked. They have slightly concave bases, and parallel to slightly curved side margins. Radiocarbon dates on wood from the Pre-Clovis level range between 15,070 ±70 and 18,250 ±80 RCYBP, calibrated to approximately  18,200–22,000 years ago. Luminescence dates taken on feldspar and quartzite grains in the various levels of the site agree, with some exceptions, with the radiocarbon assays. The luminescence dates suggest that the site stratigraphy is primarily intact and has been little affected by the movement of artifacts down through the sterile sand. Seeking the Perfect Pre-Clovis Site Cactus Hill is still somewhat controversial, in part no doubt because the site was among the earliest to be considered Preclovis in date. The Pre-Clovis occupation was not stratigraphically sealed and artifacts were assigned to Pre-Clovis levels based on their relative elevation in an environment of sand, where bioturbation by animals and insects can easily move artifacts up and down in a profile (see Bocek 1992 for a discussion). Further, some of the luminescence dates on the Pre-Clovis level ranged as young as 10,600 to 10,200 years ago. No features were identified: and, it must be said that the site is just not a perfect context. However, other, completely credible Pre-Clovis sites have been and continue to be identified, and Cactus Hills shortcomings may today be of less significance. Multiple instances of fairly secure preclovis sites in North and South America, particularly in the Pacific Northwest and along the Pacific coast, have made these issues seem less compelling. Further, the Blueberry Hill site in the Nottoway River valley (see Johnson 2012) also reportedly contains cultural levels stratigraphically below Clovis-period occupations. Cactus Hill and Politics Cactus Hill isnt a perfect example of a Pre-Clovis site. While the west coast presence of Pre-Clovis in North America is accepted, the dates are pretty early for an east-coast site. However, the context for the Clovis and Archaic sites also in the sand sheet would be similarly imperfect, except that Clovis and American Archaic occupations are firmly accepted in the region and so no one questions their reality. The arguments concerning when and how people arrived in the Americas are slowly being revised, but the debate will likely continue for some time to come. Cactus Hills status as a credible evidence of preclovis occupation in Virginia remains one of those questions yet to be fully resolved. Sources Feathers JK, Rhodes EJ, Huot S, and MJM. 2006. Luminescence dating of sand deposits related to late Pleistocene human occupation at the Cactus Hill Site, Virginia, USA. Quaternary Geochronology 1(3):167-187.Goebel T. 2013. Archaeological Records: Global expansion 300,000–8000 years ago, Americas. In: Mock SAEJ, editor. Encyclopedia of Quaternary Science (Second Edition). Amsterdam: Elsevier. p 119-134.Goebel T, Waters MR, and O’Rourke DH. 2008. The Late Pleistocene Dispersal of Modern Humans in the Americas. Science 319:1497-1502.Johnson MF. 2012. Cactus Hill, Rubis-Pearsall and Blueberry Hill: one is an accident; two is a coincidence; three is a pattern – predicting old dirt in the Nottoway river valley of Southeastern Virginia, U.S.A. Exeter: University of Exeter.Wagner DP, and McAvoy JM. 2004. Pedoarchaeology of Cactus Hill, a sandy Paleoindian site in southeastern Virginia, U.S.A. Geoarchaeology 19(4):297-322.Wagner DP. 2017. Cactus Hill, Virginia. In: Gilber t AS, editor. Encyclopedia of Geoarchaeology. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. p 95-95.

Building a Complete School Retention Form

Building a Complete School Retention Form Student retention is always highly debated. There are clear-cut pros and cons that teachers and parents must take into consideration when making such an important decision. Teachers and parents should work together to come up with a consensus as to whether or not retention is the right decision for a particular student. Retention will not work for every student.   You must have strong parental support and an individualized academic plan that promotes an alternative to how that student is taught as compared to previous years. Each retention decision should be made on an individual basis. No two students are alike, thus retention must be examined taking into account the strengths and weaknesses of each individual student.   Teachers and parents must examine a wide array of factors before deciding whether or not retention is the right decision.   Once a retention decision has been made, it is important to explore how the students individual needs are going to be met at a deeper level than before. If the decision is made to retain, it is important that you adhere to all guidelines laid out in the districts retention policy. If you have a retention policy, it is equally important that you have a retention form that gives a brief description of the reasons the teacher believes the student should be retained. The form should also provide a place for to sign and then either agree or disagree with the teachers placement decision. The retention form should summarize placement concerns. However, teachers are strongly encouraged to add additional documentation to support their decision including work samples, test scores, teacher notes, etc. Sample Retention Form The primary goal of Any Where Public Schools is to educate and prepare our students for a brighter tomorrow. We know that each child develops physically, mentally, emotionally, and socially at an individual rate. Additionally, not all children will complete twelve grades levels of work according to the same pace and at the same time. Grade level placement will be based on the child’s maturity (emotional, social, mental and physical), chronological age, school attendance, effort, and marks achieved. Standardized testing results can be used as one means of the judging process. The grade marks earned, direct observations made by the teacher, and academic progress made by the student throughout the year shall reflect the probable assignment for the coming year. Students Name _____________________________ Date of Birth _____/_____/_____ Age _____ _____________________ (Student Name) is recommended to be placed in __________ (Grade) for the _________________ school year. Conference Date ___________________________________ Reason(s) for Recommendation of Placement by Teacher: _____________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Outline of Strategic Plan for Addressing Deficiencies During Retention Year: _____________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________ _____ See attachment for additional information _____ I accept the placement of my child. _____ I do not accept the school’s placement of my child. I understand that I may appeal this decision by complying with the school district’s appeal process. Parent Signature____________________________ Date ______________ Teacher Signature __________________________ Date ______________

Introduction to Accounting and finance -- Economics, Finance and Assignment - 1

Introduction to Accounting and finance -- Economics, Finance and Management - Assignment Example The expenses of the company increases and company may not have enough cash available to meet its expenses. Therefore, the cash deficit is met by bank overdraft which affects company’s liquidity position. Company should not make all the sales and purchases on credit. It should choose a fair combination of cash and credit sales/purchases so that, company’s receivables and payables don’t reach peak levels. It is probably not possible to collect the total amount of credit sales. Some amount of credit sales turns into bad debt expense which can’t be recovered. Company should allocate small percentage of sales to bad debts. Cash is what keeps the business functioning. Company requires cash on hand to pay for its operating, investing and financing expenses. The amount of cash available/deficit is calculated by cash flow statement. Hisrich, Peter & Shepherd states that â€Å"Cash flow results from the difference between actual cash receipts and cash payments† (1998:p.297). The difference between cash flow statement and profit statement is that cash flow doesn’t consider payment of non-cash expenses, payment of loan principal and withdrawals. (Rosemary, 2010) Profits are generated by subtracting operating expenses from sales and it is calculated through income statement. Income statement tells about the total sales made during the year whether or not sales receipts are collected or not. In June, Hidetoseek Ltd. is incurring profit but its cash flow is negative which shows that company’s expenses are greater than receipts. Therefore, it should use bank overdraft to meet its expenses. If retained earnings are used, the liquidity position of the company is badly affected. The cash reserves of company decreases which means that if the company wants to pay for its debts or incur some capital expenses, it will not be able to raise significant funds through its reserves. An overdraft occurs when

Prescription Medication abuse increase in the last 10 yrs Research Paper

Prescription Medication abuse increase in the last 10 yrs - Research Paper Example ing all types of strategies to sell their products and they are not bothering about whether the sold medications are used for positive or negative purposes. This paper briefly analyses the prescription medication abuse with the help of all the independent variables mentioned above. â€Å"In the United States, physicians are faced with two opposing dilemmas in the treatment of pain – the potential for drug abuse and diversion, and the possible under treatment of pain. While controlled prescription drugs such as narcotic analgesics, anxiolytics, antidepressants, stimulants, and sedative-hypnotics, play a legitimate role in managing chronic pain and other conditions, the illicit use of prescribed medicines is increasing at epidemic proportions† (Manchikanti, MD, 2006, p.335). Prescription medication abuse is one of the largest segments of drug addiction in United States and it is second only to the marijuana abuse. It is difficult to collect the statistics of prescription medication abuse because of the difficulty in identifying whether the medication is used for curing the diseases or misused for getting some temporary psychological thrill or pleasure. The drug abusers often submit the prescriptions of the doctors to obtain medicines prescribed for some chronic diseases like psychoses. Most of the narcotic medicines are used for changing the moods of the psychologically disordered persons which may have side effects. The drug abusers often give false details to force the doctor to prescribe the narcotic medicines or pain killers which contain potentially harmful ingredients. â€Å"Cocaine (35 percent), marijuana (34%), and methamphetamine (17%) accounted for the substantial majority of Los Angeles-based illicit drug items analyzed and recorded by the National Forensic Laboratory Information System (NFLIS) for January–June 2008† (NIDA, 2009, p.49) ‘Misuse of a medicine can be referred as incorrect use of a medication by patients, who may use a drug for a

Hamilton VS. Jefferson Essay Example for Free

Hamilton VS. Jefferson Essay Both Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson have different views about the future of America, but they both and intensions to better America by 1794. Hamilton believed in the government getting stronger with the rise of large corporations that can help provided jobs. Jefferson wanted to weaken the central government, and empower the states governments. Which view was more realistic and created a more secure system? With the Hamilton and Jefferson conflict, this helped raise political parties to decide what is good for the United States of America. Each view needed the other to create a government that would be strong enough to protect itself from its people and from external strife. During the reconstruction era, both Jefferson and Hamilton had different vision and outcomes for the future of our people. Hamilton believes in a strong central government, believed that the common people often acted foolishly and most of all wanted to balance the economy by establishing a national bank. He wanted to see the rise of strong and large corporations and businesses flourish through the success of American’s trade, financing, and agriculture. Hamilton’s saw the future of America as, bringing corporations up and increasing manufactures and trade, can help maintain internal taxes and help pay off war debt. In the article, Wealth and Success, â€Å"Hamilton’s Argues for the Constitutionality of the National Bank, he explains why the Bank of the United States is helpful for America. ‘Concerning the constitutionality of the bill for establishing a national bank, proceeds, according to the order of the president, to submit the reasons which have induced him to entertain and different opinion’ (Wealth and Success).† This eventually helped us understand more on how running a nations country and Hamilton favored giving government aid for trade, finance and manufacturing which was just like the British system. By trying to strengthen the union Hamilton increased the number of federal employees and then treated individual liberties and rights, such as freedom of speech, as being restricted to some. Thinking about more power in the government creates the people to go against him. Jefferson protested Hamilton’s proposal and made it seem unconstitutional. Thomas Jefferson known as the third president of the United States wrote and signed the Declaration of Independence. Jefferson had deep faith in common people and was given power from the U.S. constitution and planed the Louisiana Purchase. Jefferson wanted more for the people and favored a weak central government and wanted more individual state power. Individual liberties must be protected by laws and didn’t support giving the government aid, like Hamilton did. While Hamilton created a New York life and was impulsive and wanted the best for himself and never listened to the people. Jefferson was less passionate about the competition between governments and wanted to eliminate internal taxes and pay off all the national debt. He believes that people should not depend on their government and a citizenry dependent on the government couldn’t become independent. Having a democratic government reduced the number of federal employees and helped distribute special privileges to the common people. Through out these different perspectives that Jefferson and Hamilton both shared, America went through hell getting things back on track. Hamilton had showed and helped noticed that Americans have been in debt for industrial development and wished to repay off debt. But this is only able to happen if you have faith and courage for the common people to help do so. He never gave the citizens a chance and created a strong government to take over. Jefferson realized that people were still being controlled when America is a free country by the government and Jefferson stood back to support the states rights. Everyone is known to be treated equally and have his or her own equal rights. Liberty and happiness comes from each individual man and among men the government is functioned through the happiness of men. Reference: http://www.wwnorton.com/college/history/america7_brief/content/multimedia/ch07/research_01c.htm http://www.studentoffortune.com/question/91067/Visions-of-Alexander-Hamilton-and-Thomas-Jefferson http://www.wwnorton.com/college/history/america7_brief/content/multimedia/ch07/research_01.htm

Journey Theme in Whitman’s O Captain! My Captain! and Tennyson’s Crossing the Bar :: Captain! My Captain! Essays

Journey Theme in Whitman’s O Captain! My Captain! and Tennyson’s Crossing the Bar The theme of a journey is a common metaphor used in poetry. This is no exception in two poems by famous poets of the 19th century: Walt Whitman and Alfred, Lord Tennyson. In Whitman’s poem â€Å"O Captain! My Captain!† from his collection Leaves of Grass, he writes of the sorrow over a fallen ship captain coming into the home harbor. Lord Tennyson’s â€Å"Crossing the Bar† expresses the hopes on the departure of a journey. Both poems use the metaphor of a boat’s trip over the sea as a spiritual journey to death. The poems have many similarities, but also differences that give character to each poem. Each poem is shaped by its imagery, speaker, and emotional invocation. Without such literary devices, the poems would not have such an emotional impact of the reader. Both â€Å"O Captain! My Captain!† and â€Å"Crossing the Bar† are similar in their themes of a journey. In Whitman’s poem, the crew of a ship is returning to their home port from a long journey. All is finished, with the purpose of the expedition completed, except their captain has fallen dead on the deck of the ship. The speaker describes the festivities on the shore as the boat arrives, the joyous townspeople celebrating the return of their captain. This contrasts the sullen mood on the ship, where the crew deeply mourns the loss of their captain. In â€Å"Crossing the Bar,† the speaker is about to depart on a journey, one from which he expects not to return. He hopes that his journey will not be difficult, especially when he first sets out. He pleads to the reader not to mourn or protest against his departure. Although these are both journeys, there are key differences. Whitman addresses the mournful return from a voyage, while Lord Tenn yson writes of a final exit from a life. While the speaker in â€Å"O Captain!† appeals that his captain be not dead, the speaker in â€Å"Crossing the Bar!† implores almost the complete opposite. He says in lines 11-12 â€Å"And may there be no sadness of farewell,When I embark;† He is content in leaving the life he has known, to go on this final journey to see his â€Å"Pilot.

Good vs Evil in Gregory Maguire’s “Wicked” Essay

What is good and what is bad seems pretty easy to define. Good is being morally right, an action or a quality that does not cause harm to people, harm to self, nor cause sadness. Goodness benefits others, if not the self, and it causes happiness. Evil is the opposite of good, or the absence of good. But these are only the general meanings of these two concepts. In religion, good and evil are represented by different beings. In Christianity, being good means to please God, the Creator. Jesus Christ is also good, and heaven is where good souls go to. On the other hand, the Devil, being a fallen angel, represents evil, and hell is where bad souls are tortured for eternity. Other religious practices in the world may or may not have divine beings that people worship, but they also have concepts of good and evil. Evil is defined by goodness. If good is defined, bad is automatically defined as well, because bad is, to put simply, not good. For example, if good would be represented by a child who obeys his/her parents, then bad would be a child who does not obey his/her parents. The question is what if the â€Å"bad† child has a reason to not obey his/her parents? What if the reason is besides being bad, such as what if the child disobeyed his/her parents to fulfill a promise to a friend? Good and evil only represents the black and white, but reality tells us that there are also grey areas, some things which are not exactly bad, but not exactly good either. Gregory Maguire’s novel, â€Å"Wicked†, a sort of prequel to the classic children’s novel, L. Frank Baum’s â€Å"Wizard of Oz†, is about good and evil, and these grey areas in between, which are acts done by people which are not good but also not evil. It tells of the story of the infamous Wicked Witch of the West. In the original â€Å"Wizard of Oz† books, the witch is not named, only given the title of The Wicked Witch of the West. Described as green-skinned, wearing black clothes with a black pointed hat, riding on a broomstick, and afraid of water, this witch character became almost a stereotype for all other witches. In â€Å"Wicked†, this witch is given the name Elphaba Thropp, with the first name take from the initials of the original author of â€Å"Wizard of Oz†. One of the first things that readers will notice and perhaps find interesting is the quotations in one of the first pages. Maguire quotes three, one of which is from â€Å"The Wizard of Oz†, about the dialogue between the Wizard and Dorothy. The Wizard requests Dorothy to kill the Wicked Witch of the West, and in return he will help her return to Kansas. This quote may make a child think, given that the child fully understands what is morally right and wrong in the society. Killing is wrong. Why should Dorothy kill the witch? Because she is bad? But killing a bad person will not make a person good. Or does it? Does a wrong action turn into a right action if there is a good reason for committing the action? With this quote, a person who is about to read â€Å"Wicked† will start thinking about the nature of good and evil, and will get the central idea of the book. In the first part of the â€Å"Wicked†, the birth of Elphaba is told. Readers will learn the occurrences when she was born and the background of her parents. From the time she was born, Elphaba had skin of â€Å"undeniable green† (p. 20). She also had sharp fangs that she bit off the finger of the fisherwife when she was still a baby (p. 20). These different characteristics makes her an oddity, and somehow inhuman. For this reason, it is assumed that Elphaba grew up being a victim of prejudice. This prejudice later proved to be an important experience for her, because her intentions and motivations all came from the prejudice and cruelty that she experienced as a child, and even as an adult. Despite this, she grew up smart and curious. She also questions things that most people accept, such as the concept of evil. In a conversation with Galinda, she asks if evil does exist. â€Å"They seemed to be obsessed with locating it [evil]†¦ an evil spring in the mountains, an evil smoke, evil blood in the veins†¦ â€Å"†¦ The early unionists†¦ argued that some invisible pocket of corruption was floating around the neighborhood, a direct descendant of the pain the world felt when Lurline left. Like a patch of cold air on a warm still night. A perfectly agreeable soul might march through it and become infected, and then go and kill a neighbor. But then was it your fault if you walked through a patch of badness? If you couldn’t see it? † (p. 80-81) This is foreboding, because later in the story, Elphaba does â€Å"walk through a patch of badness†, though she does not mean to walk into it.

Demutualization of Stock Exchanges

DEMUTUALIZATION OF STOCK EXCHANGES PROBLEMS, SOLUTIONS AND CASE STUDIES Edited by SHAMSHAD AKHTAR Director, Governance, Finance and Trade Division, East and Central Asia Department, Asian Development Bank  © Asian Development Bank 2002 All rights reserved. The views expressed in this book are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Asian Development Bank, or its Board of Governors or the governments they represent. The Asian Development Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility for any consequences for their use.Use of the term â€Å"country† does not imply any judgment by the authors or the Asian Development Bank as to the legal or other status of any territorial entity. ISBN 971-561-475-2 Publication Stock No. 100602 Published and printed by the Asian Development Bank P Box 789, 0980 Manila, Philippines . O. CONTENTS Foreword Principal Authors Abbreviations xiii xv x xi PART I : ISSUES INVOLVED IN STOCK EXCHANGE DEMUTUALIZATION 1 Demutualization of Asian Stock Exchanges— Critical Issues and Challenges by Shamshad Akhtar 1. 1 1. 2 1. 3 1. 4 1. 5 1. 6 1. 7 1. Introduction Demutualization: Its Definition, Size and Significance Motivation and Driving Factors for Demutualization From Mutuality to Demutualization of Exchange Benefits of Demutualization of Exchanges Regulatory Oversight: Challenges and Responses for Demutualized Exchange Financial Viability of Demutualized Exchange Conclusion 3 3 4 5 8 12 19 25 29 2 2. 1 2. 2 2. 3 2. 4 2. 5 2. 6 Background Information on Demutualization by Pamela S. Hughes Introduction What Demutualization Means The Reasons to Demutualize The Models An Update Since Demutualization Conclusion 33 33 33 36 40 43 47Demutualization of Stock Exchanges—Problems, Solutions and Case Studies APPENDIX 1 : The Models 48 3 Motivations, Mechanics and Models for Exchange Demutualizations in the United States by Roberta S. Karmel 3. 1 3. 2 3. 3 3. 4 Overview Reasons for Demutualization How Demutualization is Accomplished Post-Demutualization Models 59 59 61 65 70 4 The Structure of a Demutualized Exchange— The Critical Issues by David Holthouse 4. 1 4. 2 4. 3 4. 4 4. 5 4. 6 4. 7 Introduction Ownership Corporate Governance Access Rights Risk Management Financial Management Conclusion 73 73 73 77 80 81 82 83 Demutualization of Exchanges— The Conflicts of Interest (Hong Kong) by William Pearson 5. 1 5. 2 5. 3 5. 4 5. 5 5. 6 5. 7 Structure of Exchanges Regulatory Role and Self-Regulation Public Policy Objectives of Stock Market Regulation Why Should Demutualization Require a Reassessment of SRO Functions? What Responses are Being Developed to Deal with These Problems? Conclusion Hong Kong’s Framework: Listing of HKEx and the Framework for Dealing with Conflicts of Interest 85 85 88 91 92 95 99 100 iv Contents APPENDIX : Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited: Reinforcing Hong Kon g’s Position as a Global Financial Centre—A Policy Paper 2 : Memorandum of Understanding for the Listing of HKEx on SEHK 3 : Section 13 of the Exchanges and Clearing Houses (Merger) Ordinance 4 : Chapter 38 of the Rules Governing the Listing of Securities on the Stock Exchanges of Hong Kong Limited 5 : Procedures to Deal with Conflicts of Interest 105 114 131 APPENDIX APPENDIX APPENDIX 133 138 APPENDIX 6 Demutualization of Exchanges—The Conflicts of Interest (An Australian Perspective) by David Holthouse 6. 6. 2 6. 3 6. 4 6. 5 6. 6 6. 7 6. 8 6. 9 Introduction Background to Conflicts An Exchange’s Listing Regulation of Other Listings Supervision of Intermediaries Profit Motive versus Supervisory Function Public Interest versus the Exchange’s Commercial Interest New Business Lines Conclusion 145 145 146 148 149 149 150 152 153 154 7 Demutualization of Exchanges—The Conflicts of Interest (The Australian Regulator’s Experience) by Claire Grose 7. 1 7. 2 7. 3 Introduction Self-Listing Other Conflicts 157 157 157 160 vDemutualization of Stock Exchanges—Problems, Solutions and Case Studies 8 8. 1 8. 2 8. 3 Regulation of a Demutualized Exchange (Canada) by Pamela S. Hughes Introduction Role of an Exchange Self-Regulation and Government Oversight SRO Conflicts of Interest Supervision of Listings Self-Listing Managing Conflicts of Interest Prudential Regulation Shareholders Directors and Officers Memoranda of Understanding Conclusion 163 163 165 165 169 171 171 172 172 173 175 175 176 8. 4. 8. 5 8. 6 8. 7 8. 8 8. 9 8. 10 8. 11 8. 12 9 9. 1 9. 2 9. 3 9. 4Regulation of a Demutualized Exchange (Singapore) by Lee Boon Ngiap Background Regulatory Issues Arising from Demutualization The Regulatory Relationship between the Monetary Authority of Singapore and Stock Exchange of Singapore Conclusion 177 177 178 179 183 10 Regulation of a Demutualized Derivatives Exchange (United States) by Natalie A. Markman 185 185 186 190 192 195 Introduction A New Framework Exchange Oversight Regulatory Issues Raised by Demutualization Conclusion 10. 1 10. 2 10. 3 10. 4 10. 5 vi Contents APPENDIX APPENDIX APPENDIX : Designated Contract Markets for Regulated US Derivatives Exchanges 2 : Registered Derivatives Transaction Execution Facilities 3 : The CFTC Market Surveillance Program 196 202 205 11 Regulation of Demutualized Exchanges (Australia) by Claire Grose 213 213 214 214 215 215 217 Legislative Framework Australian Securities and Investment Commission’s (ASIC) Powers Supervision by Market Operators Memoranda of Understanding (MOUs) Changes Due to Demutualization New Legislation 11. 1 11. 2 11. 3 11. 4 11. 5 11. 6 PART II: DEMUTUALIZATION CASE STUDIES 2 Australian Stock Exchange—The Conversion to a Demutualized Exchange: ASX’s Experience by David Holthouse 12. 1 12. 2 12. 3 12. 4 12. 5 12. 6 12. 7 12. 8 12. 9 Introduction Background to Australian Stock Exchange’s Demutualization Obtain ing Member Approval Mechanism Used for Conversion Changes to the Corporations Law The Demutualization Process Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with ASIC Demutualization and Listing Outcomes Subsequent Supervisory Development: ASX Supervisory Review Pty Limited 221 221 222 223 224 225 226 228 229 230 ii Demutualization of Stock Exchanges—Problems, Solutions and Case Studies 12. 10 Changes in ASX’s Focus and Activities 12. 11 Conclusion 231 233 13 Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited— Demutualization, Merger and Listing: The Hong Kong Exchanges’ Experience by Lawrence Fok 235 235 236 238 239 242 246 Introduction Pre-Merger Period: Two Exchanges and Three Clearing Houses Merger and Proposal Reasons For the Merger Market Reform Conclusion 13. 1 13. 2 13. 3 13. 4 13. 5 13. 6 14Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission— The Conversion to a Demutualized Exchange: The Hong Kong Regulator’s Experience by William Pearson 247 247 250 255 258 258 The Need for Reform The Reform Process Rationalized Market Regulation Implementing Legislation: Exchanges and Clearing Houses (Merger) Ordinance Key Issues Arising from Hong Kong’s Experience with Demutualization 1 : Summary of the Exchanges and Clearing Houses (Merger) Ordinance 14. 1 14. 2 14. 3 14. 4 14. 5 APPENDIX 261 15Singapore Stock Exchange—Demutualization and Listing of the Singapore Exchange Limited by Alan Shaw 265 265 Introduction 15. 1 viii Contents 15. 2 15. 3 15. 4 15. 5 15. 6 15. 7 15. 8 15. 9 Drivers for Change: The Rationale for Demutualization and Merger Impact of Demutualization The Merger Act The Process of Demutualization The Singapore Exchange’s Initial Public Offer The Structure of Singapore Exchange The Governance of Singapore Exchange Listing and Conflict of Interest 265 267 269 270 271 272 274 276 279 281 5. 10 Conclusion APPENDIX 1: Procedures to Deal with Conflicts of Interest 16 Toronto Stock Exchange—From Toronto Stock Exch ange to TSE Inc. : Toronto’s Experience with Demutualization by Timothy Baikie 283 283 283 286 291 292 296 298 298 Introduction An Overview of the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSE) The Development of Mutual Exchanges Consolidation, Globalization and New Competition The Demutualization Decision Market Regulation by a Demutualized Exchange Next Steps Conclusion 16. 1 16. 2 16. 16. 4 16. 5 16. 6 16. 7 16. 8 17 Demutualization of the Philippine Stock Exchange by Maria Larrie Alinsunurin 299 299 300 300 301 304 307 Introduction Ownership Structure of the Stock Exchange Upon Demutualization Trading Rights Corporate Governance Business of the Exchange Statutory Regulatory Role 17. 1 17. 2 17. 3 17. 4 17. 5 17. 6 ix Demutualization of Stock Exchanges—Problems, Solutions and Case Studies PART III: STRUCTURE OF MUTUAL EXCHANGES 18 The Colombo Stock Exchange (Sri Lanka) y Rajeeva Bandaranaike 18. 1 18. 2 18. 3 18. 4 18. 5 18. 6 18. 7 18. 8 18. 9 Ownership Structure Listing Data Corpor ate Governance Business of the Exchange The Vision, Mission and Corporate Strategy Trading Rights Regulatory Framework Self-Regulation Statutory Regulatory Role 313 313 314 314 315 316 317 317 317 319 320 321 321 18. 10 Investor Protection 18. 11 Funding of the Colombo Stock Exchange 18. 12 Stock Exchange Seeks to Demutualize 19 The Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange (Malaysia) y Securities Commission (Malaysia) 323 323 323 324 324 325 326 327 329 329 Introduction Ownership Structure of the KLSE Listing Data Corporate Governance Business of the Exchange Trading Rights Risk Management and Supervisory Issues Statutory Regulatory Role Stock Exchange Seeking to Demutualize 19. 1 19. 2 19. 3 19. 4 19. 5 19. 6 19. 7 19. 8 19. 9 x Contents 20 The Shanghai and Shenzen Exchanges: Business Operation, Governance Structure, and Regulatory Function (People’s Republic of China) by Feng Wei 331 331 332 333 335 337 Overview Business Operation Governance Structure Regulatory Function Outlook on Demu tualization 0. 1 20. 2 20. 3 20. 4 20. 5 21 The Taiwan Stock Exchange (Taipei,China) by Wanpo (Mina) Wang 341 341 342 342 343 344 344 347 347 Ownership Structure of Taiwan Stock Exchange Corporation Listing Data Corporate Governance Business of the Exchange Trading Rights Risk Management Statutory Regulatory Role Stock Exchange Seeking to Demutualize 21. 1 21. 2 21. 3 21. 4 21. 5 21. 6 21. 7 21. 8 22 Current Organizational and Regulatory Structure of The Stock Exchange (Thailand) by Klao Sanasen 349 349 352 Thai Capital Market Structure The Stock Exchange of Thailand 2. 1 22. 2 xi Contents FOREWORD Demutualization of a stock exchange is entire process by which a non-profit member-owned mutual organization is transformed into a forprofit shareholder corporation. Exchanges around the world have been demutualizing because of international competition and technological challenges to traditional modes of trading securities. The change of a stock exchange from a member-owned organization to a for-profit shareholder corporation triggers a number of questions about regulatory oversight.When a demutualized exchange is listed on its own board, some regulatory oversight needs to be transferred to a government regulator. In many countries, demutualization of the major national stock exchange has been accompanied by general securities regulatory reform. This book grew out of a conference on Demutualization of Stock Exchanges held in Manila on 13-14 August 2001 organized under the APEC Financial Regulators Training Initiative sponsored by the Asian Development Bank.The conference focused on developing greater understanding of demutualization by discussing the general problems it engenders and how these might be solved, developing common themes and lessons from case studies and also seeing how different countries have evolved different approaches to demutualization. This book is divided into three parts. Part I, consisting of Chapters 1-11, discuss various dimensions and iss ues involved in the process of stock exchange demutualization.Chapters 1-3 give a broad overview of the reasons for demutualization, the critical issues and challenges, the decision-making process relating to demutualization and the possible models stock exchanges may choose, including that of a privately owned for-profit corporation and that of a publicly held company listed on the exchange’s own board. Chapter 4 sets forth the critical issues an exchange and its regulator must confront in connection with the demutualization process from the vantage point of a particular jurisdiction—Australia.Chapters 5-7 discuss the conflicts of interest raised by an exchange’s demutualization and then Chapters 8-11 set forth how regulators in Canada, Singapore, the United States and Australia attempted to deal with some of these conflicts through regulation. Part II of this book is a series of case studies. Chapters 12-17 discuss the demutualization experience in Australia, Hong Kong, Singapore, xiii Demutualization of Stock Exchanges—Problems, Solutions and Case Studies Toronto and the Philippines.Part III of this book provides information about jurisdictions that have not demutualized their exchanges. Chapters 18-22 discuss the Colombo, Kuala Lumpur, Shanghai and Shenzen, Taiwan and Thailand exchanges. Chapters 1-16 were submitted as papers by professionals who presented papers at the conference. Chapters 17-22 were submitted by participants in the conference who were not presenters. This conference was coordinated by the Finance and Industry Division (East) of ADB under the overall guidance and supervision of Ms.Shamshad Akhtar, Director, Governance, Finance and Trade, East and Central Asia Department. Special thanks are due to the various contributors as well as the organizers. The book has been edited by Ms. Akhtar. Ms. Roberta Karmel, Professor of Law at Brooklyn Law School, was engaged to integrate the conference materials and provide edi torial advice. R. Jane Lee, a student at Brooklyn Law School supported the compilation of this book. Mr. Lyle Raquipiso coordinated the publication of this book and Ms. Nancy Bustamante provided administrative support. Geert H.P van der Linden . B. Director General East and Central Asia Department Asian Development Bank xiv Contents PRINCIPAL AUTHORS SHAMSHAD AKHTAR is Director, Governance, Finance and Trade Division of the Asian Development Bank’s (ADB’s) East and Central Asia Department. She oversees ADB’s financial market operations in the People’s Republic of China, Mongolia and the Central Asian Republics, including SME, microfinance and other rural market financial intermediation; governance and private sector assessment work; and trade liberalization and facilitation.Concurrent to holding other portfolio from 1998-2001, she was head of ADB Secretariat for Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation, leading the policy dialogue and preparation of all papers/ documents for this forum, involving interactions with Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors and their Deputies. Before joining ADB in 1990, she worked as Economist in the World Bank in the 1980’s, and prior to that, in Pakistan’s Planning Agency. She obtained a B. A. in Economics and M. Sc. in Economics from Islamabad, an M. A. n Development Economics from University of Sussex in the United Kingdom (UK), and a Ph. D. in Economics also from UK. She had her post-doctoral fellowship as a Fulbright scholar and was visiting fellow at the Department of Economics, Harvard University in 1987. Ms. Akhtar has presented numerous papers on economics and finance in international conferences. TIMOTHY BAIKIE is Director, Global Market Initiatives at the Toronto Stock Exchange and is responsible for analyzing market structure issues from a broad, strategic standpoint, including the market model for the Global Equity Market (GEM).Previously, he was Special Counsel, Market Regula tion and Director of the Regulatory and Market Policy Division of the Exchange, which is responsible for policy and rule development for the equities and derivatives market. He has spoken at numerous conferences on market regulation, market structure and corporate governance issues and was a member of the Advisory Board for the 1999 Canadian Corporate/Securities Law Moot Court Competition. He received a B. A. from York University (Glendon College), an LL. B. and a B. C. L. from McGill University and an LL. M. rom the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. He was called to the Ontario Bar in 1987. LAWRENCE FOK is the Deputy Chief Operating Officer of Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited and the Chief Executive of the Stock Exchange. Mr. Fok joined the Stock Exchange in February 1992 and was xv Demutualization of Stock Exchanges—Problems, Solutions and Case Studies appointed Executive Director of the Listing Division in February 1997 and Senior Executive Director of it s Regulatory Affairs Group in November 1998. Mr. Fok has over 19 years of experience in financial services and securities regulatory work.Before joining the Stock Exchange he worked for the Securities and Futures Commission, the Office of the Commissioner for Securities and Commodities Trading of the Hong Kong Government and other private organisations in areas of corporate finance advisory work, securities dealing, venture capital investment, mainland China trade and investment management. CLAIRE GROSE is Special Counsel, Regulatory Policy Branch at the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC). For two years prior to July 2001, she held the position of ASIC’s Director, National Markets Unit.Before joining ASIC in January 1999, Ms. Grose was a senior partner in the national Australian law firm Freehill Hillingdale & Page, specialising in corporations and securities law. She has more than 20 years experience as a corporate lawyer and played a major part in devel oping changes to the Corporations Law in Australia in her role as a member of the Corporations Law Simplification Task Force from October 1993 to March 1997. DAVID HOLTHOUSE is National Manager, International Affairs, at the Australian Stock Exchange (ASX), which he joined in February 1996.His responsibilities include fostering links with governments, businesses and market participants to ensure that ASX has a role in shaping the regional capital market environment, coordinating ASX’s international activities to ensure strategic fit, identifying cross-border listing opportunities where ASX can add value, and providing an effective protocol service on behalf of the Exchange. He has been a member of the Working Committee of the East Asian and Oceanian Stock Exchanges Federation (EAOSEF) since 1997 and is currently the Federation’s Working Committee Chairman.A key activity of the Committee during this time has been the facilitation of cross-border trading. He was formerly a career naval officer, retiring as a Rear Admiral in 1993. He is a member of the governing bodies of a number of professional and charitable organisations, and a Graduate of the Australian Institute of Company Directors. He is a Chartered Professional Engineer, and a Fellow of both the Institute of Engineers Australia and the Institute of Marine Engineers (UK). He was appointed as an Officer in the Order of Australia in 1991. xviPrincipal Authors PAMELA S. HUGHES is a securities law partner at Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP in Toronto. Her practice focuses on international corporate finance and mergers and acquisitions transactions and advice regarding capital market regulatory reform. Ms. Hughes is a member of the team of lawyers from Blake, Cassels & Graydon involved in the ongoing Ontario Securities Commission (OSC) Policy Reformulation Project which commenced in 1995. Prior to February 1, 1995, Ms. Hughes was Director of the Capital Markets/International Markets Branch of the OS C.Ms. Hughes has also taught international securities regulation in the LL. M. programme at Osgoode Hall and the LL. B. programme at the University of Toronto, and was a contributing editor to North American Corporate Lawyer. Ms. Hughes updated the chapter on Philippines securities law in International Securities Regulation: Pacific Rim, Volumes I and II (New York: Oceana) released in 2000. In 2000, Ms. Hughes was nominated by the federal Department of Finance to the financial services roster for dispute resolution under the North American Free Trade Agreement.ROBERTA S. KARMEL is a Professor of Law and Co-Director of the Center for the Study of International Business Law at Brooklyn Law School and Of Counsel to the law firm of Kelley Drye & Warren LLP In addition, she is a . director of the Kemper Insurance Companies. She was a Commissioner of the Securities and Exchange Commission from 1977-80, and a public director of the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. from 1983-89. She received a B. A. cum laude from Radcliffe College in 1959 and an LL. B. cum laude from New York University School of Law in 1962.Professor Karmel is the author of over 30 articles in legal journals, and writes a regular column on securities regulation for the New York Law Journal. Her book entitled Regulation by Prosecution: The Securities and Exchange Commission vs. Corporate America was published by Simon and Schuster in 1982. LEE BOON NGIAP heads the securities regulatory policy function in Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS). His division is responsible for regulatory framework development, policy coordination and market analysis of the securities, futures and asset management industries in Singapore.Prior to taking up his responsibility in the Securities and Futures Department, Mr. Lee was the Representative in the MAS office in London, responsible for spearheading the promotion of Singapore as an attractive place for UK and European financial institutions to invest and set up operatio ns. Mr. Lee joined MAS in 1986 and worked in several departments before joining the Markets and Investment Department, where he rose to become a Senior Assistant Director in the Monetary Management Division. xvii Demutualization of Stock Exchanges—Problems, Solutions and Case StudiesThere his responsibilities included the conduct of Singapore’s exchange rate and monetary policies, and management and evaluation of the foreign exchange exposures of public sector entities. He holds an honours degree in Civil Engineering from the National University of Singapore and is a Chartered Financial Analyst. NATALIE A. MARKMAN is Counsel to Commissioner Thomas J. Erickson of the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission. She provides legal counsel and analyzes such policy issues as those created by derivatives market deregulation, electronic trading, and exchange demutualization.Ms. Markman reviews and evaluates all documents submitted by staff for Commission approval, including exch ange designations, contract and rule approvals, rulemakings, opinions, and enforcement actions. Previously, she served as Special Counsel in the Commission’s Office of International Affairs, as an Attorney-Advisor in the Office of the Chief Counsel of the Commission’s Division of Trading and Markets, and as an Attorney-Advisor to Commission Administrative Law Judge George H. Painter. Ms.Markman also was a Teaching Fellow for the Foundations of American Law and Legal Education program at the Georgetown University Law Center, where she received her J. D. degree in 1993. WILLIAM PEARSON is Director in the Corporate Finance Division of the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) in Hong Kong. He is responsible for assisting in formulating policies for the effective regulation of listed companies and the securities markets. Daily work involves monitoring and regulating corporate activities of publicly listed companies, overseeing the Stock Exchange in its listing related fu nctions, nd approving offerings of shares and debentures to the public by non-listed companies. Mr. Pearson joined the SFC as a Senior Manager in the Corporate Finance Division in 1998. Prior to that he spent nine years as a lawyer with Norton Rose, a London law firm, practicing in the areas of corporate finance and M&A. He graduated as a lawyer from King’s College, London in 1987. ALAN JOSEPH SHAW is Executive Vice-President of the Singapore Exchange Limited, Head of Risk Management and Regulation.Previously, from 1991-2000, he was National Manager, Supervision of the Australian Stock Exchange Limited, Melbourne. He was educated at the University of Melbourne, from which he received a Bachelor of Laws in 1979, a Graduate Diploma of Public Policy in 1988, and a Master of Arts in Public Policy in 1994. From 1980-91, he served as a Principal xviii Principal Authors Legal Officer for the National Companies and Securities Commission, as a Judge’s Associate, and as a Barris ter. He has authored a number of articles on company law. xix Abbreviations ABBREVIATIONSAmex APEC Archipelago Archipelago Exchange ASIC ASTC ASX ATS BOT CATS CBA CBI CBOT CCASS CDNX CDS CFE CFTC CGE CME CMP CNS CSE CSRC DTF EBOT ECM ECN Australian Securities and Investments Commission Australian Settlement and Transfer Corporation Pty Ltd Australian Stock Exchange alternative trading system Bank of Thailand computer assisted trading system Colombo Brokers Association Canadian-based interlisted issuer Chicago Board of Trade Central Clearing and Settlement System Canadian Venture Exchange Central Depository System communication front-end system Commodity Futures Trading Commission Committee on the Governance of the Exchanges Chicago Mercantile Exchange Capital Market Masterplan Continuous Net Settlement Colombo Stock Exchange China Securities Regulatory Commission derivatives transaction execution facility exempt board of trade exempt commercial market electronic communications netwo rk American Stock Exchange Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation Archipelago Holdings, LLC Archipelago Exchange, LLC xxi Demutualization of Stock Exchanges—Problems, Solutions and Case Studies ETF ETP FCM FIBV GEM HIBOR HKCC HKEC HKEx HKFE HKFECC HKSCC IDA IISL IMM IOM IOSCO IPO KLSE KULBER LFX LSE MAS MCD MDEX ME MESDAQ MkSE MMCD MOF MOU MSE xchange traded fund equity trading permit futures commission merchant International Federation of Stock Exchanges Growth and Emerging Market Hong Kong Interbank Offered Rate HKFE Clearing Company Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited Hong Kong Futures Exchange Limited HKFE Clearing Corporation Limited Hong Kong Securities Clearing Company Investment Dealers Association India Index Services & Products Limited International Monetary Market Index and Option Market International Organization of Securities Commissions Initial Public Offer Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange KLSE-Bernama Real-Time Information Services L abuan International Financial Exchange London Stock Exchange Plc Monetary Authority of Singapore Malaysian Central Depository Malaysia Derivatives Exchange Montreal Exchange Malaysian Exchange of Securities Dealing and Automated Quotation Bhd Makati Stock Exchange Mark to Market Collateral Deposit Ministry of Finance memorandum of understanding Manila Stock Exchange xxii Abbreviations MSRS NASD NASDAQ NASDR NSE NYSE OECD OM OSC OTC PCX PCX PCX Holdings PCXE PSE REC RIIAM SAFE SC SCA SCANS SCCP SCORE SCH SEA SEC SEHK SEL SEOCH SES SET Malaysian Share Registration Services National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc. NASD Regulation, Inc. National Stock Exchange of India New York Stock Exchange Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development OM Gruppen AB Ontario Securities Commission over-the-counter Pacific Exchange PCX Equities, Inc. PCX Holdings, Inc.PCX Equities, Inc. Philippine Stock Exchange, Inc. recognized exchange controller Research Inst itute of Investment Analysts Malaysia South Asian Federation of Exchanges Securities Commission Securities Commission Act 1993 Securities Clearing Automated Network Services Sdn Bhd Securities Clearing Corporation of the Philippines System on Computerised Order Routing and Execution Securities Clearing House Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 Securities and Exchange Commission The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited Taiwanese Securities and Exchange Law SEHK Options Clearing House Limited Stock Exchange of Singapore Stock Exchange of Thailand xxiiiDemutualization of Stock Exchanges—Problems, Solutions and Case Studies SFA SFC SFE SGX SGX-ST SIA SIIS SIMEX SIPF SME SRC SRO STAMP TBDC TSD TSE TSE RS TSE TSEC TSI Securities and Futures Act Securities and Future Commission SFE Corporation Limited (formally known as Sydney Futures Exchange Limited) Singapore Exchange Limited Singapore Exchange Securities Trading Ltd Securities Industry Act 1983 Special Isolated Immediate Settleme nt Singapore International Monetary Exchange Limited Securities Investors Protection Fund Small Medium Enterprise Board Securities Regulation Code Self-regulatory organization standard message protocol Thai Bond Dealing Center Thailand Securities Depository Co. , Ltd.The Toronto Stock Exchange TSE regulatory services Tokyo Stock Exchange Taiwan Stock Exchange Corporation Thailand Securities Institute xxiv PART I Issues Involved in Stock Exchange Demutualization Demutualization of Asian Stock Exchanges—Critical Issues and Challenges 1 Demutualization of Asian Stock Exchanges— Critical Issues and Challenges Shamshad Akhtar 1 1. 1 Introduction Stock exchanges offer a host of services to listing companies. These include: (i) liquidity, (ii) execution of services, (iii) signaling function for listed companies, (iv) monitoring of trading to prevent manipulation and insider trading, (v) standard rules to reduce transaction costs, and (vi) clearing of buy and order transaction s.Traditionally, stock exchanges operating as a â€Å"club of brokers† offered these services as monopoly operators serving largely under a mutual governance structure. The members of the club enjoyed rights of ownership, decision-making (one member, one vote), and trading. Value enhancement of the exchange was achieved by restricting access. Stock exchanges are now increasingly changing their business model and restructuring themselves across the world due to the simultaneous convergence of a number of powerful developments. The most notable of these has been the: (i) rapid advancement and innovation 1 Director, Governance, Finance and Trade, East and Central Asia Department, Asian Development Bank. 3 Part I: Issues Involved in Stock Exchange Demutualization n technology that has facilitated alternative trading systems (ATS) including electronic communication networks (ECNs); and (ii) growing market competition and integration as well as globalization induced partly by cross -border listing and portfolio flows, etc. Together these developments have eroded the significance of physical national stock exchanges and their trading floors. Consequently, across the globe stock exchanges are now rethinking their business strategy and model in order to find ways of how best to survive. In the process, exchanges have evolved towards new corporate, legal and business models to strengthen governance and face the competition.This process of transformation from members' associations into for-profit corporations is referred to as demutualization. There is a great need to distill lessons from the rapidly evolving experience with demutualization and synthesize both the normative and positive aspects of this exciting and relatively new structure so that developing countries can take advantage of it. This paper, therefore, aims to provide basic perspectives and dimensions of demutualization based on a review of literature and experience. In the process it explains: (i) Wh at is demutualization and how significant has it been? (ii) What factors have been driving the demutualization of exchanges? iii) What ownership, legal and strategic approaches are being adopted in the process of demutualization? (iv) What are the principal benefits of demutualization? (v) What regulatory challenges and responses does a demutualized exchange face? (vi) Have the demutualized exchanges been financially viable? 1. 2 Demutualization: Its Definition, Size and Significance Demutualization, in the strictest sense, refers to the change in legal status of the exchange from a mutual association with one vote per member (and possibly consensus-based decision making), into a company limited by shares, with one vote per share (with majority-based decision making).Demutualization makes sense if it induces a change in the exchange’s objective from managing the interests of a closed 4 Demutualization of Asian Stock Exchanges—Critical Issues and Challenges member-based organization with a central focus on providing services for the benefit primarily of the members/brokers and keeping costs and investments limited to financing agreed by members, into a company set up with the objective of maximizing the value of the equity shares by focusing on generating profits from servicing the demands of their customers (brokers and investors) in a competitive manner. The number of exchanges that have privatized or listed has been increasing since the Stockholm Stock Exchange demutualized in 1993.In 1999, 11 stock exchanges had been privatized or listed and this number rose to 21 by early 2002, with several other exchanges either considering demutualization or already having stated their intent to do so. Of the World Federation of Stock Exchanges-formerly the International Federation of Stock Exchanges (FIBV)-member exchanges, around 52% of stock market capitalization is accounted for by demutualized exchanges. In Asia, demutualized stock exchanges including the Tokyo Stock Exchange now account for 76 % of the region's market capitalization (Figures 1. 1 and 1. 2). Figure 1. 1. Market Capitalization FIBV Stock Exchanges (2001) Figure 1. 2. Market Capitalization Stock Exchanges in Asia (2001) Demutualized 52%Not demutualized 48% Demutualized 76% Not demutualized 24% Source: International Federation of Stock Exchanges (FIBV) Source: International Federation of Stock Exchanges (FIBV) 1. 3 Motivation and Driving Factors for Demutualization Today, exchanges are no longer the sole primary and secondary market makers or the sole service providers of trade execution, signaling or other activities. This is largely because of the widespread proliferation of ATS and ECNs that have been supported by technological revolution and introduction of high capacity hardware, software packages and Internet facilities. ATS/ECNs have allowed efficient and effective matching 5Part I: Issues Involved in Stock Exchange Demutualization of the buy and sell orders of customers at lower transaction costs, while offering price transparency, trader anonymity and extended trading hours. Large global brokers are able to price-match within their own order-stock and only report the net position as a trade to the exchange (thus avoiding transaction costs). Given the competitive edge, the market share of the ECNs has grown. In 2002, ECNs have accounted for 45% of NASDAQ shares traded (compared to 25. 5% in 1999) – although they only accounted for about 5% of the listed shares traded. Of the several ECNs, Island ECN alone accounted for 32% of the ECN's market share.Instinet makes up another 29%, ArcaEx 27. 2% (formed through the merger of Archipelago and REDIBook), Bloomberg Tradebook 6. 3% and Brut ECN 5. 3%. The rest is accounted by other networks. 2 Having attracted substantial trading, ECNs are also entering into strategic alliances or tie ups with other exchanges or are offering services such as quotes and listing shares to further raise re venues. The growing competitive pressure has also triggered a wave of restructuring and mergers and alliances among securities markets to maximize economies of scale, accessibility and market reach, while providing global trade facilities through around the clock trading.For instance: (i) Euronext was established by the merger of former national exchanges in France, the Netherlands, Belgium and Portugal and the integrated equity trading markets of the northern-European countries of Sweden, Finland, Denmark and Norway; (ii) in the derivatives markets, a/c/e, the trading platform of Eurex and Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT), and Globex (Chicago Mercantile Exchange, Liffe, Singapore and others), have already formed global alliances with participants from all time zones, thus creating 24 hour trading markets; and (iii) NASDAQ has developed global alliances/interconnections to attract more liquidity for the United States and regional securities markets. NASDAQ has structured agreements wit h Europe, Japan, Hong Kong and Canada and is positioned for similar arrangements with China, Latin America and Middle East. In Asia, several exchanges have trading links and dual-listing agreements with the United States-based NASDAQ. 2 Global Finance Staff Research. 2002. National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD). JP Morgan, H. 6 Demutualization of Asian Stock Exchanges—Critical Issues and Challenges The market integration has encouraged a process of disintermediation.With the emergence of new structures, there is no need for formal floors of stock exchanges or financial market intermediaries and participants, as they do not add value (to match the cost) to trading of securities. Exchanges with low market capitalization and weak trading volumes have had to particularly re-examine their operations and organizations with the view to increasing their competitive offering and price mix to minimize further diversion of trading volumes. Summarizing the emerging issues, a r ecent World Bank study3 concluded that: â€Å"Powerful trends of internationalization and migration of order flow are putting pressures on stock exchanges around the world. For some exchanges, already more than half of trading and listing has migrated offshore†¦ Migration makes it difficult for countries to sustain a full-fledged local stock exchange.As trading volumes further decrease, financing the fixed overhead of maintaining market oversight, clearing and settlement systems, †¦ and generating enough business for local investment banks, accounting firms, and other support services will become even harder, especially for smaller emerging markets. The trend towards increased migration will thus make it more difficult for small exchanges to survive. † [page 18] In order to survive in this environment, exchanges need to diversify and move towards commercially oriented business practices with greater focus on improving efficiency, accessibility and ease of use of the ir systems. Since exchanges have higher overhead costs (as compared toECNs) due to (among other things) cost of building and facilities, they need to strive harder to achieve profitability and economies of scale, while offering competitive services and fees compatible to those being provided by the ECNs. These considerations have driven exchanges to consider alliances and consolidation. By merging two exchanges, the exchange can multiply the volume at the same overhead cost (provided cost cutting synergies are fully explored). It can thus offer to the investors and brokers more listed securities for trading on the same platform. There are forecasts available that indicate that by 2010, there will be fewer than five major stock exchanges; and, perhaps two or three of these will be entirely electronic markets—which have not yet been established. 4 3 4 Claessens, Stijn, et. l. 2002. Explaining the Migration of Stocks from Exchanges in Emerging Economies to International Centers. World Bank Working Paper No. 2816. Young, Patrick. 1999. Capital Market Revolution: The Future of Markets in an Online World. Harlow: Financial Times. 7 Part I: Issues Involved in Stock Exchange Demutualization 1. 4 From Mutuality to Demutualization of Exchange The transformation of exchanges from mutual to demutualized structure involves two key features: (i) a change in the ownership structure, and (ii) a change in legal as well as organizational form. Both need to be accompanied by adequate safeguards to ensure appropriate governance.Depending on the nature of ownership and legal forms adopted, the demutualized exchange—given their corporate model and facing growing competitive pressures—lends itself to focusing on evolving strategic positioning which, depending on a number of conditions, could involve greater market consolidation, vertical integration and product diversification. 1. 4. 1 Ownership Structure The transformation from the mutual member-based to demutu alized exchange involves issues of transferability of ownership from members to nonmembers. There are various ways that dilution of membership can be achieved. Sequentially, it involves conversion of existing member seats by monetizing these and assigning a certain value per seat.Once the valuation is done, the members can opt to convert their membership to share ownership or to sell off their interest to nonmembers. In most cases of demutualization of exchange, members have opted to retain their share ownership. A listing of equity shares in the exchange facilitates the unlocking of the members' equity and buy out of the interest of the traders, while leading to the monetization of the value of the members' seats. An entity with freely transferable shares, rather than membership rights, can form equity-swap-based strategic alliances or mergers with other exchanges, domestically or in other countries or time zones. Such alliances are stronger and offer greater credibility than pure cooperation agreements.To avoid stock exchanges operating in special or limited interests, securities regulators often place restriction on ownership by one holder or a group of holders to non-controlling stakes of 5-10%. Limits on ownership stakes could affect potential take-over by other exchanges. Such take-overs could have merit in terms of efficiency and economies of scale of the market especially where more efficient participants acquire inefficient ones. Recognizing the synergies of take-overs, most demutualized exchanges have provisions in place to allow other 8 Demutualization of Asian Stock Exchanges—Critical Issues and Challenges exchanges, or technology partners, the possibility of acquiring or swapping strategic stakes.The reluctance to relinquish control to strategic partners or owners remains however one reason why non-equity, swapbased cooperative alliances have been more prolific in the exchange industry. 5 Indeed, several hostile take-over attempts (includin g OM Gruppen's moves to acquire the London Stock Exchange in 2000, and the bidding war for Sydney Futures Exchange by Australian Stock Exchange and Computershare in 1999) have failed due to the voting strength still exerted by the brokers (Table 1. 1). 1. 4. 2 Legal and Company Structure Most stock exchanges are registered as private limited companies with a paid-up capital base, while others operate as member associations or cooperative arrangements.At the end of 2000, FIBV statistics indicates that 90% of its member exchanges, accounting for 60% of market capitalization, were private limited companies. Almost 46% of these were legal company exchanges with inside ownership. Around 25% (accounting for 21% of market capitalization) of the exchanges had been privatized, 13% (accounting for 8% of market capitalization) were registered as listed companies6 and the remaining 17% had other types of status—with some being state-owned or semi-public entities (such as the Shenzhen and Shanghai Stock Exchanges (SZSE and SHSE). As evident in Table 1. 2, in Asia, with the exception of SZSE and SHSE, most of the exchanges are legal entities registered as private limited companies.So far, five exchanges in Asia have been fully demutualized, with three of these listed on their own exchange, and another two have announced plans to demutualize in 2003. The legal structure for the demutualized exchange is based on considerations similar to that for any profit-making company including decisions on number of shareholders (partnership vs. corporation), voting procedures, limitation of liability (liability limited to equity invested vs. joint and several liability for all debts), accounting and reporting requirements (based on taxation laws and on partners/shareholders' access to information of the company) and distribution of dividends (re-investment 5 6Interestingly, this is similar to another rapidly globalizing industry with national quasimonopolistic companies—th e airline industry—in which global cooperation alliances have proven very important for customer retention. Notably half (of six) of the exchanges that have listed themselves are in Asia. 9 Part I: Issues Involved in Stock Exchange Demutualization Table 1. 1. Asian Stock Exchanges: Shareholding Structure SHAREHOLDING LIMIT Australian Stock Exchange (ASX) Initially maximum shareholding limit was 5%, but the Financial Services Reform Act raised this to 15% in March 2002. Higher shareholding can be allowed if it is in national interest subject to approval of the Minister for Financial Services and Regulation.Singapore Exchange Limited (SGX) Maximum shareholding limit is 5% and can be higher if approved by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS). In 2001, MAS announced that, with its approval, strategic investors and fund managers who invest pools of consumer funds could acquire up to 10% of share-holding. SHAREHOLDING STRUCTURE As of June 2001, issued and paid-up capital of AS X amounted to A$106,282,000. After listing, ASX’s shareholders rose from 606 to 16,313. Besides individual investors, the large domestic and international fund managers subscribed to ASX equity including Chase Manhattan Nominees Ltd. whose holding is 6. 9%, National Nominees Ltd. 3. 5%, followed by AMP Life Ltd. (2. %), Westpac Custodian Nominees Pty. Ltd. (2. 11%) and Citicorp Nominees Pty. Ltd. (2. 07%). The top 20 shareholders account for 27. 3% of issued capital. SGX has authorized share capital of S$1,000,000,00. As of August 2001, its issued and paid-up capital stood at S$10,000,000. The top shareholders include SEL Holdings Pte. Ltd with 25% of total shares (but owing to the restrictions in the exercise of votes attached to shares, SEL is not regarded as a substantial shareholder), Raffles Nominee Pte. Ltd. (12. 9%), followed by DBS Nominees Pte. Ltd. (9. 9%), Overseas-Chinese Bank Nominees Ltd. (5. 3%) and HSBC Singapore Ltd. and Citibank Singapore (each over 4. %), a nd others with significant stake in the range of 0. 60-2%. The top 20 shareholders account for 77. 8% of total shares. Out of the shares issued to SEL, the Company made an Initial Public Offer (IPO) and a private placement. The IPO raised S$470 million. Consequently, the issued and fully paid share capital of SGX increased from S$61,670 as at 30 June 2000 to S$10 million as at 16 November 2000. HKEx has authorized share capital of HK$2,000,000,000. As of December 2001, issued and fully paid capital amount to HK$1,040,664,846. As of March 2002, the two Central Clearing and Settlement System (CCASS) Participants held 28. 8%, and 12. 1% of HKEx’s issued share capital.SFC granted approval to these two entities as minority controllers of HKEx on the basis that the shares are held in custody for their clients. Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited (HKEx) Maximum shareholding limit is 5%. The Securities and Futures Commission (SFC), in consultation with the Finance Secretary, may give approval to a person to hold more than 5% where it can be demonstrated to be in the interest of the public or the investing public. Philippine Stock Exchange (PSE) The Securities Regulation Code imposes a 5% maximum shareholding limit for individuals and individual companies and 20% for industry or business groups. The demutualized PSE has an authorized capital stock of P36. million, with subscribed and fully paid-up capital base of P9. 2 million representing a portion of the members’ total contribution of P286. 6 million as of 31 December 2000. Each of the 184 member-brokers was granted 50,000 common shares of the new PSE at a par value of P1. 00 per share. The remaining members’ contribution of P277. 4 million will be booked under additional paid-in surplus. Prior to demutualization, TSE had a capital of Y11,500 million. After demutualization, TSE raised it to Y22,874 million by issuing 2,300,000 shares for equal allotment to its members. The total number of au thorized shares after demutualization is 9,200,000. TSE now has 114 shareholders.Tokyo Stock Exchange (TSE) Under the Securities and Exchange Law, there is a 5% maximum shareholding limit. Source: Stock Exchanges. Latest Annual Reports 10 Demutualization of Asian Stock Exchanges—Critical Issues and Challenges Table 1. 2. Asian Stock Exchanges: Legal and Corporate Structure STOCK EXCHANGE TSE LEGAL FORM TSE was demutualized on 1 November 2001 Legal Status: Company SGX was demutualized in December 1999 Legal Status: Company (for profit). Singapore Exchange Securities Trading Limited (SGX-ST), the stock exchange, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of SGX. HKEx was demutualized in March 2000 Legal Status: Company (for profit) with the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited (SEHK) set up as a wholly- owned subsidiary of HKEx.ASX was demutualized on 13 October 1998 Legal Status: Company (for profit) LISTING STATUS Not listed (plans to list in FY2005) SGX On 23 November 2000, the Company was admitted for listing of SGX-ST. SGX became a public-listed company with 1,000,000,000 ordinary shares outstanding. HKEx Listed ASX ASX was listed on its own exchange on 14 October 1998. When ASX shares were quoted on 14 October 1998, they closed at A$4. 25; sub-sequently they rose as high as A$16 by 16 March 1999. By the end of 1999, they traded at a range of A$10 to A$11, valuing the company at between A$1 billion and A$1. 1 billion. Not Listed PSE PSE was demutualized in August 2001 Legal Status: CompanySource: Stock Exchanges. Latest Annual Reports needs vs. distribution to partners, taxation). In most jurisdictions, a limited liability company has been observed to be the traditional and preferred option for profit-making ventures involving more than a close group of partners. The methods for transforming an association into a limited liability company varies between jurisdictions, but in principle, the existing members agree to transfer the assets and operations of their associ ation to a newly formed company, in exchange for shares in that new company. 11 Part I: Issues Involved in Stock Exchange Demutualization 1. 5 Benefits of Demutualization of Exchanges 1. 5. Improvements in Corporate Governance Exchanges, when run as mutual associations, clubs and cooperatives of traders and brokers allow members exclusive rights of access to trading systems and platforms. Operating under this mutual structure, exchanges enjoyed quasi or full monopoly on trading and they derived profits from the intermediation of nonmember transactions. Since members under the mutual structure were owners of the exchange, they imposed rights to trading and disallowed direct access to the trading floor to any outsiders. Brokers inadvertently resisted changes if these entailed additional costs, loss of revenue or competitive threat.This resistance eventually impeded the ability of the company to react quickly to a rapidly changing market environment. Also, in some developing countries if the exchanges enjoyed a legal or decreed national monopoly, government-appointed officials and stakeholder representatives were often represented on the board. While in the short-run such appointments may have proved conducive to mitigating entrenched vested interests, in the long-run these can prove counter productive leading to unhealthy government interference. With the changing economics of automated auction trading and its easy access electronically, the economics of member-cum-trading floor based exchanges has lost its merit.As a result, it has generated pressures to replace the age-old reliance on one member, one vote and the committee-based decision structure where control is vested with the interest groups that have exclusive rights of intermediation at exchange. Under demutualization, there is increased acceptance to separation of ownership from membership that automatically provides trading rights. This segregation helps introduce effective corporate governance if: (i) there are accompanying improvements in the incentive structure,7 which allow the exchanges to sell their equity stakes to nonmembers and outsiders, (ii) decision making is based on this new ownership structure (not on rights of intermediation), and (iii) when there is an effective oversight of a governing board and a company structure. 7 Steill Ben 2002.Changes in the Ownership and Governance of Securities Exchanges: Causes and Consequence. In Brookings-Wharton Papers on Financial Services. Washington D. C. : Brooking Institution Press. 12 Demutualization of Asian Stock Exchanges—Critical Issues and Challenges Since under demutualization the economic ownership of the exchange is separated from trading membership, it is not appropriate that interest groups (such as the trading members) have exclusive authority over the decisions of exchange. After demutualization, some exchanges have granted less than 50% of the voting rights to the broker members on the board of the exchange (see Table 1. 3).To gradually decrease broker influence on the board, the exchanges have appointed independent directors or directors that are nontrading owners. After demutualization, the appointment of government appointed officials (a common feature of exchanges in developing economies) has by and large been viewed as controversial given that the demutualized exchange is a private sector company operating in a competitive environment. In environments where broker influences are often daunting, the continued role of the representative(s) of the securities regulator can support the transition of exchange till such time as the regulation is changed to allow the exchanges to operate in a fully competitive manner.Besides appropriate board representation, it is important that the management of the exchange is fully qualified and motivated to act not only in the best interests of the shareholders, but also to conduct the business in a prudent manner so as not to disrupt the orderly and fair trading in the capital markets. To ensure that this public interest is satisfied, â€Å"fit-and-proper† screening of the board and management, similar to tests put in place in the banking regulations of many jurisdictions, could be undertaken. The management should be accountable to the board, which would determine management's appointment and remuneration, supervise the strategic direction and audit the financial and operational results, including risk management, and if needed, effect the removal of management.To ensure the effective supervision and auditing of management, it would seem prudent to ensure that a majority of board members are truly independent directors. To remain competitive, a stock exchange must follow international best practices in ethics and procedures. This is necessary in order to ensure that institutional investors do not shift their investments to other alternatives perceived to be more fair or secure. Therefore, it is in the profit-motivated exchange's best interest to ensure fair and transparent practices; and, as such, good corporate governance needs to be an integral part of the exchange once it is driven by the profit motive. 13Part I: Issues Involved in Stock Exchange Demutualization Table 1. 3. Asian Stock Exchanges: Board Representation STOCK EXCHANGE ASX BOARD REPRESENTATION/COMPOSITION 9 member board of directors. Of ASX's 9 directors, 4 are ASX Members/ Affiliates. 11 member board of directors. Of SGX 11 directors, 4 represent broker interests. SGX plans to broaden membership base by attracting new international members both global and regional securities houses. In addition, SGX will be introducing a new membership structure that allows new and existing members to choose between trading-only membership or clearing-only membership or both trading and clearing membership. Central Depository Pte. CDP) clearing rules have been revised to incorporate the admission requirements and expect to launch the new membersh ip structure in the third quarter of 2002. The board comprises 8 Public Interest Directors appointed by the Financial Secretary to represent public and market interests, 6 Directors elected by shareholders, and the Chief Executive of HKEx who is an ex-officio board member. Pursuant to the Exchanges and Clearing Houses (Merger) Ordinance, the number of Public Interest Directors will be reduced to no more than the number of elected Directors immediately following the annual general meeting of HKEx in 2003. 51% of the board (8 of 15 directors) should be independent. 11 member board of directors, of whom 6 are outside directors. SGX HKEx PSE TSESource: Stock Exchanges. Latest Annual Reports 1. 5. 2 Opening Up of Trading Rights of Exchanges Consistent with the for-profit motive, the demutualized exchanges in Asia have included provisions to admit new trading partners (Table 1. 4) and permitted eligible applicants (new customers) unrestricted commercial access to the services of exchange. Some exchanges, however, adopted a moratarium period on the issuance of new trading rights. If share ownership were a requirement for trading membership, it would be relatively easy for existing members to protect their market share by refusing to sell existing or issue any new shares, thus barring new entrants.If new shares can only be issued to the active trading members, then the public, financial institutions, institutional investors and others would generally not be able to invest. The question of a broader ownership 14 Demutualization of Asian Stock Exchanges—Critical Issues and Challenges Table 1. 4. Asian Stock Exchanges: Trading Rights and Dividend for Profit-Seeking STOCK EXCHANGE ASX TRADING RIGHTS Trading rights may be acquired through application with ASX or from an existing Participant. Trading rights have to be acquired through application with SGX, as these cannot be secured through transfer from an existing member. In July 2000, SGX opened the securities mar ket to new members, and five new member firms joined in 2000.SGX also changed its rules to allow a single legal entity to be a member firm in each of the securities and derivatives markets thereby furthering their members' opportunities to trade in both markets. Access to the markets may be obtained through acquisition of trading rights from existing members of the exchanges and from HKEx after the expiry of a two-year moratorium on March 2002. Trading rights issued by HKEx (other than those automatically conferred to the exchange shareholders on the effective date) will not be transferable. For a further period of 2 years thereafter, no new trading rights will be issued for less than HK$3. 0 million per Stock Exchange Trading Right or for less than HK$1. 5 million per Futures Exchange Trading Right.An entity may acquire trading right from an existing trading participant (with approval of TSE), or through application with TSE. Trading right can be acquired through purchase from an e xisting trading participant. PSE temporarily imposed a moratorium on the issuance of new trading rights and limits it to its present number of 184, transferable for an unlimited period of time. PAYOUT RATIO 70% of net profit after tax. 85% SGX HKEx 46% TSE n. a. PSE n. a. Source: Stock Exchanges. Latest Annual Reports base of the exchange (as a public listed company) is critical in situations where exchanges need to raise funds for future investments. Broader ownership would help avoid potentially large swings in the value based on the trading of a limited number of shares only.With share ownership separated from the right to trade, the question of the compensation of existing trading members arises especially since trading rights are granted freely to new members when the existing 15 Part I: Issues Involved in Stock Exchange Demutualization members had to acquire their trading memberships. If existing shareholders continue to retain their shares, then they would enjoy the trading r ights granted to the shareholders and there would be no need to compensate them for trading rights. This is argued largely because for both the old and new shareholders, the economic value that the shares now represent would always be inclusive of the right to trade provided such rights have been granted.In order for shares to have economic value, there must be an expectation of dividends, at some point in the future. The introduction of a dividend policy (which does not exist in mutual exchanges), coupled with a listing of the shares, thus transfers the value of stock exchange share ownership from the right to trade, to the right to receive dividends and trade the shares (see Table 1. 4). These factors should in theory minimize the resistance to the demutualization of exchanges by the brokers. However, a moratorium (limited in time) on the granting of new trading rights has often been introduced to lessen the competitive impact on smaller brokers. 1. 5. Restructuring and Alliances of Exchanges After being demutualized, most exchanges have revisited their commercial strategy to improve viability and enhance business prospects. Exchanges have opted to: (i) consolidate, merge and/or integrate their domestic markets; (ii) build alliances by establishing cross-border linkages with other exchanges within or outside the region; and (iii) merge with other exchanges—a phenomena more predominant thus far in Europe. In Asia, the exchanges have by and large opted thus far for (i) and (ii). Emphasis has been largely to re-group businesses to broaden the markets, offer issuers and investors better distribution networks and improved liquidity.Predominant in-country mergers or restructuring have taken place in Singapore, Hong Kong, Australia and Japan, and in early 2002, the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange (KLSE) merged with MESDAQ (Table 1. 5). In-country restructuring of exchanges has involved: (i) Merger of two or more exchanges into a single viable nationallevel compa ny, which would be of sufficient scale to be an interesting partner for other (foreign) exchanges, and as a listed company for investors to consider. While these mergers lead to 16 Demutualization of Asian Stock Exchanges—Critical Issues and Challenges Table 1. 5. Asian Exchanges: Mergers and Alliances STOCK EXCHANGE TSE MERGERS PRIOR TO DEMUTUALIZATION Hiroshima and Niigata Stock Exchanges merged with the TSE in March 2000. ALLIANCES W

The Necessity Of Web Pages Essays - Computing, Digital Media

The Necessity Of Web Pages Essays - Computing, Digital Media The Necessity Of Web Pages In todays modern world, in order to reach the most amount of people, using the least amount of time and money, one must have a web page. A web page is your universal, non-misplacable, chockfull of information, business card. It can display everything that the consumer needs to know, everything from prices to products, from times to locations. In order to succeed, you need a web page. Now, in order to display all this great content that one has brewing in their brain, one MUST get a domain. A domain is the physical local where the information for the web page is stored. Some domains offer vast amounts of space but slow download speeds; whereas others offer phenomenal download speed, but no for graphics, movies or other things to spruce up a page. When choosing a domain one must consider the name that the customer must type in to get to the web page. If one registers a web page with geocities, their url, or Universal Resource Locator, which indicates the page internet location would be something like, geocities.com/joeshmoe/index.html; not exactly easy to remember is it? But if one were to have, or register, their own url then the address could be, joeshmoe.com; which is much more personal and professional. To make the site surfer-friendly one should plan out the content of the web page and make sure that it is easy to navigate. When trying to make the web page look professional and user friendly frames versus flash is always a big controversy. Some people believe that because of the higher quality of images and interaction and motion that flash provides that it is the best when considering how to improve a page. I happen to believe, however, that because frames offers the same style of navigation, but also has a much smaller download time that it is the superior option. If one now knows what format they want, one should now plan out what the content should be. If one believes that they can do no more to the plan and one believes that the page is ready to publish then it is time to learn java, html, Microsoft Frontpage, or flash; depending on what one choose as their format. I do not recommend using a publisher, whether it be geocities or frontpage, because then the web page designer isnt learning and it is the cheap easy way out, that doesnt always get one what they want. Publish the finished page to the server so that everyone can view it, there is only one step left. Now that everything is up and running there is only one thing left to do, ADVERTISE!! The only possible way to get people to see ones web site is to tell them about it. If they do not know it is there, they will not go. There are several ways to advertise, leave your web address on the answering machine, tell friends, put it on ones business card, join a web ring (a web ring is a ring of web pages all related to each other), and/or create banners to put on other peoples sites. Banners are images and/or links that contain information about ones site and attract customers, like a magazine advertisement. This is the process for creating a web page. It is very important to create a web page to fully impact an audience and get meaning and message across.

Positive vs. Negative Commands in Spanish

Positive vs. Negative Commands in Spanish Spanish uses a different verb form for positive direct commands (such as do it) than it does for negative direct commands (dont do it) in the familiar second-person form, that is, when speaking to tà º or vosotros. Note the differences with the following regular verbs, all of them in the imperative mood. Pronouns in parentheses are optional and are included here for clarity: habla (tà º) (speak, you singular); no hables (dont speak, you singular); hablad (vosotros) (speak, you plural); no hablà ©is (vosotros) (dont speak, you plural) come (tà º) (eat, you singular); no comas (dont eat, you singular); comed (vosotros) (eat, you plural); no comis (vosotros) (dont eat, you plural) vive (tà º) (live, you singular); no vivas (dont live, you singular); vivid (vosotros) (live, you plural); no vivis (vosotros) (dont live, you plural) The same endings are usually used for most of the irregular verbs as well. Note that the negative form of familiar second-person commands is the same as the present subjunctive form. Here are some examples of sentences showing the difference with irregular verbs: Ve a casa. (Go home, singular) No vayas a casa. (Dont go home.) Id a casa. (Go home, plural) No vayis a casa. (Dont go home, plural.) Hazlo. (Do it.) No lo hagas. (Dont do it.) Hacedlo. (Do it, plural.) No lo hagis. (Dont do it, plural.) Dime. (Tell me.) No me digas. (Dont tell me.) Decidme. (Tell me, plural.) No me digis. (Dont tell me, plural.)

Critical Thinking Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Critical Thinking - Case Study Example Arbitration would ensure that consumers are able to have their cases resolved at a quicker rate and without any loss of time. The consumer can therefore be able to perform his/her daily duties with minimal fuss. According to Currier et al., recent studies suggest that, the percentage of consumer arbitration case outcomes, in favor of the consumers, stood at 55% and an additional 93% of respondents interviewed, regarding their general feelings and perceptions of the use of arbitration in consumer contracts, was favorable. They cited that they thought that, the use of arbitration, was more favorable than court cases due to their perceived fairness in dealing with consumer cases (Currier et al., 2009). Additionally, arbitration as a process is significantly cheaper than litigation in court. The high fees required by lawyers is non-existent in arbitration making it a cheaper alternative to court litigation. The insertion of the arbitration clause provides consumers with the ability to protect themselves against harmful or sub-standard goods and services supplied by a company. The arbitration clause provides consumers with the choice to purchase a good or service from one company or another in accordance with their preferences and tastes. Additionally, the arbitration clause provides a legal avenue that can be exploited by the consumer in case of a dispute. The introduction of binding arbitration clauses in consumer contracts will help both parties protect themselves against disputes and breach of

Schoolbased HIV Prevention Programs Article Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Schoolbased HIV Prevention Programs - Article Example The objectives of the curriculum are that students will be able to set a personal sexual limit, describe their reasons for maintaining their sexual limit, identify problems that may arise in maintaining their sexual limit and describe how they will address those problems and maintain their limit. The classroom curriculum was developed over a two year period. The researchers used theories about what students needed to postpone sexual activity, we developed activities and then tested them in the classroom. Student reactions to the lessons were observed and they were asked for comments at the end of each lesson. The Healthy Oakland Teens Project (HOT) established by the Center for AIDS Prevention Studies began providing innovative HIV prevention education in Oakland, CA in 1989. The project's goal was to reduce adolescents' risk for HIV infection by using peer role models to advocate for responsible decision making, healthy values and norms, and improved communication skills. The HOT program educated ninth grade students during a one semester, daily class to become HIV peer helpers for seventh grade students. After extensive training, the ninth grade peer helpers delivered weekly interactive sessions in seventh grade science classes, focusing on values, decision-making, communication, and prevention skills. The program trained 30 ninth grade peer helpers who in turn taught 300 seventh graders each year.A parent education program was also implemented for AIDS prevention. Saving Sex for Later is an audio CD program that educates parents about helping their sons and daughters navigate normal p ubertal changes and the challenges of becoming a teenager and supporting them in staying abstinent during the critical early adolescent years. Developed with extensive input from parents and youth, Saving Sex for Later used engaging and dramatic stories to model how parents can communicate effectively with their children. The results showed that listening to the Saving Sex for Later CDs helped parents talk to their children about puberty, romantic relationships, and delaying sexual activity. Youth whose parents received the CDs reported more family rules, greater family support, and less risky behavior.Some interventions to reduce the risk of the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) that target youths have resulted in short-term increases in self-reported condom use. BF Stanton et. al (1997) carried out a randomized, controlled trial of a community-based intervention delivered in eight weekly sessions which involved 76 naturally formed peer groups consisting of 383 (206 interve ntion and 177 control) African-American youths 9 to 15 years of age. A theory-based, culturally and developmentally tailored instrument that assessed perceptions, intentions, and self-reported sexual behaviors was administered to all subjects at baseline and 6 and 12 months later. At baseline, 36% of youths were sexually experienced, and by 12 months of follow-up, 49% were sexually experienced. Self-reported condom use rates were significantly higher among intervention than control youths (85% vs 61%; P