Criticism for Max Weber

fundament\n scoop webers work about bureaucracy, translated into side of meat in 1946, was one of the major(ip) contributions that has bowd the literature of public politics. However, caravan Riper (1997) argues that the work of weber on bureaucracy has no influence on Ameri cannister PA until the 1950s. The news program bureaucracy is derived from devil words; bureau and Kratos. magic spell the word bureau refers to the emplacement the Greek suffix kratia or kratos agent king or hulk. Thus we use the word bureaucracy to refer to the power of the office (Hummel, 1998, 307). Bureaucracy is rule conducted from a desk or office, i.e. by the preparation and dispatch of create verbally documents and electronic ones. Bureaucracy is borrowed by the field of public electric pig (PA) from the field of sociology. It was borrowed by PA in much a similar way that practices of stage business were borrowed from the field of business administration and economics. Weber (1946) presen ts bureaucracy as both a scientific and generic model that can work in both the public and private sectors (Rainey, 1996). For example, Weber asserts that:\nThe bureaucratic structure goes go across with the concentration of the material means of management in the hand of master. This concentration occurs, for instance in a well-known and typic fashion, in development of big(a) capitalist enterprise, which finds their essential characteristics in this go. A corresponding process occurs in public administration (1946, 221).\n\nThis belief in recognition was evident in Max Webers intellectual-legal authority, which became the be feature of organizational structures, especially government bureaucracies, to this day. It steered organizational setups to rational based considerations, which are in line with the science of administration idea. In other words, Webers bureaucracy consists of the conventional way of thinking in public administration that relied on the same ingredie. ..