Can An Atheist Support Intelligent Design - 1145 Words

Can an Atheist Support Intelligent Design? Intelligent design is an extremely controversial subject. It has been debated in schools, churches, and even personal conversations. Intelligent Design is the theory that supports the idea of an intelligent being existing as the creator of certain aspects of the universe and biological life. It does not go as far as to try to identify this intelligence, it just notes its presence. Knowing the definition of Intelligent Design, it seems impossible that an atheist could believe in it. But since the intelligence is not specified, Intelligent Design is not strictly a religious belief. There obviously cannot be one opinion for the entire atheist community, but can Intelligent Design be supported by atheists? To answer this question a good understanding of Intelligent Design is essential. As stated, it is the belief that life or the universe was created by an outside being or intelligence. The said intelligence does not have to be a god. Who or what created life is up to the belie ver. People can believe in different creators but still support the same Intelligent Design theory. Intelligent Design (ID) just acknowledges that the universe was created by something and not randomly formed. Many scientists, along with non- experts, believe in ID because biological structures are so complex and suitable for life it seems that they would have to be carefully designed. This may sound similar to creationism, however it is veryShow MoreRelatedThe Design Argument : The Theory Argument1608 Words   |  7 PagesThe Design Argument In the past hundred years, a great debate has shaken the foundation religious and scientific beliefs of society. Philosophers have been arguing about such a debate for hundreds of years, but there does not seem to be any consensus on whether on the existence of god and the universe. The ancient world never battled over such questions, rather they had accepted the fact that the natural world was created by some being. However, as society made major advancements, the questionRead MoreAnalysis Of H.j s Article A Journal Call Question1362 Words   |  6 Pages H.J. McCloskey Published an article in a journal call Question One in February of 1968, he named it â€Å"On Being an Atheist†. In McCloskey’s article, he states a very compelling explanation in why he thinks the everlasting disputes of God’s existence fails. My paper is responding to McCloskey’s arguments with a theistic worldview. In McCloskey’s article, he ventured to explain how atheism is by far more rational, as well as more comfortable than theism is. McCloskey used the wordRead MoreOn Being an Atheist1280 Words   |  5 Pagesand in a way that they were not meant to be used. McCloskey claims that the â€Å"mere existence of the world constitutes no reason for believing in such a being† (1968, p. 51) however the cause of the universe must be an uncaused necessary being. This can be disproved with the non-temporal form of the cosmological argument which states that the universe had no beginning in time, thus it is infinitely old. Nevertheless, the world around us is made up of contingent beings which rely on a cause for theirRead MoreAnalysis Of The Short Article On Being An Atheist 1714 Words   |  7 PagesJ. McCloskey is the author of the short article â€Å"On Being an Atheist†. He has also written many more books on the support of atheism. For this essay we will be looking at his article â€Å"On Being an Atheist†. In his article, McCloskey examines many Christian arguments for the existence of God. McCloskey not only says that Christians are wrong in using these arguments but he critically analyzes them from the view point of a devout atheist. While H. J. McCloskey gives his strong beliefs on the existenceRead MoreThe Argument Of God s Existence1737 Words   |  7 Pagesarguments in support of God’s existence as well as philosopher H.J McCloskey’s article On Being an Atheist. Within McCloskey’s article he refers to three well known theist arguments as proofs the cosmological, teleological and argument from design. The Cosmological argument is a deductive argument that assumes every fact must have an explanation and comes to the conclusion â€Å"the uncaused cause must be God† (Slick, 2013). On the other hand the teleological as well as the argument from design are notRead MoreSummary Of On Being An Atheist1341 Words   |  6 PagesFor many years theists and atheists have argued with one another over the existence of a creator, or God. H.J. McCloskey published his thoughts on the matter in a journal article in 1968 titled â€Å"On Being an Atheist†. In his article McCloskey aims to discredit cosmological and teleological arguments for a creator and he uses the existence of evil in the world as evidence that a divine creator cannot exist. McCloskey routinely refers to the cosmological and teleological arguments as believers’ â€Å"proof†Read MoreAnalysis Of The Article On Being An Atheist By H. J. Gilman1664 Words   |  7 PagesIn the article, â€Å"On Being an Atheist† by H. J. McCloskey’s, he makes several arguments as â€Å"proof† of God’s non-existence to support his atheism. He attacks arguments made by advocates on the existence of God. The arguments argued by Theist are not arguments for proof of God’s existence but are arguments for definitive beliefs of God’s existence. Any argument on proving the Almighty God’s existence is unsatisfactory. The Theist does not attempt to offer â€Å"proof† of God’s existence but rather offerRead MoreEssay on Response to â€Å"on Being an Atheist†1531 Words   |  7 PagesResponse to â€Å"On Being an Atheist† By: Casandra Privette In his article, On Being an Atheist, H.J. McCloskey tried to show that atheism is a more reasonable and comfortable belief than that of Christianity. McCloskey argued against the three theistic proofs, which are the cosmological argument, the teleological argument and the argument from design. He pointed out the existence of evil in the world that God made. He also pointed out that it is irrational to live by faith. In my responseRead MoreCreation: Scientifically Proven? Essay1537 Words   |  7 Pages An atheist is someone who does not believe in a God or creation, but this leads to a sort of problem in beliefs throughout the world and it attacks past heritages and religions. Is there not a God and if there was, can it be scientifically proven? With this concept in mind scientist can make a new set of theories in Macroevolution, which is the study of evolution in large portions such as the universe. With this, we find all sorts of ideas but no proven answers, as there is small evidence to theRead MoreIs There Good Evidence for or Against the Existence of God?1557 Words   |  7 Pagesunmoved mover, the uncaused causer and idea of contingency, these three arguments are all a posteriori (based on the evidence in the universe around us). The unmoved mover is the concept that, in theory (is logically acceptable even for an atheist), that nothing can be in motion without something first putting it into motion. This argument is very similar to Aristotle’s, which is the idea that everything that changes shape, temperature or simply into something else must be changed by something. Aquinas